When David Grusch testified under oath about “Non-Human Intelligence,” most attention focused on craft, materials, and secrecy. Less attention was given to the language itself.
“NHI” is not a cultural term. It is a legal construct. Unlike “extraterrestrial,” it avoids assumptions about origin and location. It does not require space travel. It does not exclude Earth. It leaves room for intelligence that is non-human yet terrestrial, ancient, or hidden.
This linguistic shift matters. It aligns with a long-standing pattern in which older narratives resurface under modern terminology. Antarctic anomalies, sub-glacial structures, Inner Earth traditions, and pre-Ice Age civilizations have existed at the margins of discourse for decades. What changes now is not the data, but the permission to acknowledge continuity without naming it directly.
Disclosure, in this sense, is not revelation. It is a reclassification.
Antarctica does not need to be proven as a former center of civilization to matter. It only needs to remain unresolved. The same applies to Agartha, Inner Earth traditions, and accounts of advanced knowledge predating known civilizations. These elements persist because they were never fully removed; instead, they were only renamed.
What we are witnessing is not first contact, but the slow reintroduction of context that was previously excluded.